Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries

Social data in digital form—including user-generated content, expressed or implicit relations between people, and behavioral traces—are at the core of popular applications and platforms, driving the research agenda of many researchers. The promises of social data are many, including understanding “what the world thinks” about a social issue, brand, celebrity, or other entity, as well as enabling better decision-making in a variety of fields including public policy, healthcare, and economics. Many academics and practitioners have warned against the naïve usage of social data. There are biases and inaccuracies occurring at the source of the data, but also introduced during processing. There are methodological limitations and pitfalls, as well as ethical boundaries and unexpected consequences that are often overlooked. This paper recognizes the rigor with which these issues are addressed by different researchers varies across a wide range. We identify a variety of menaces in the practices a

Focus: Bias
Source: Frontiers in Big Data Journal
Redability: Expert
Type: PDF Article
Open Source: Yes
Keywords: social media, user data, biases, evaluation, ethics
Learn Tags: Bias Ethics Fairness Framework
Summary: This article highlights data quality issues and general challenges for research using social data, including population biases, behavioural biases, content biases, linking biases, temporal variations and redundancy.